Legal Opinion

Rickless v. Temple

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1970No. Civ. 33379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Statement of the Case

Plaintiff, by her second amended complaint, as superseded by pretrial statements and orders, on which the cause went to trial, sought, in the first cause of action therein, to have a deed executed by her on certain real property situated in the City of Santa Monica to defendant, declared to be a mortgage given to secure a loan of $20,000; to have the court determine the amount justly due on such loan and to permit her to deposit that amount with the clerk of the court for the benefit of the defendant; that upon such deposit, she be granted a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muccilli v. Huff's Boys' Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Earp v. EarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API