Legal Opinion
Vaughan v. Dickinson
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 22, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 2103PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, Chief Judge.
To make clear the question presented by the motion of Duffy, trustee of the Petroleum Conversion Corporation, to intervene in this Civil Action, No. 2103, it is necessary that the court state briefly ;the facts as to the preceding and present litigation relating to Albert G. Dickinson.
It appears that on or about August 3) 1948, a decree was entered in the United States District Court for the southern district of New York, determining that James A. Vaughan and other intervening claimants in litigation pending in that court were entitled to recover from Albert G. Dickinson…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States Casualty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- William Duffy, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Petroleum Conversion Corporation v. James A. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Gillispie v. Miami TownshipDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023