Legal Opinion
Holland Furnace Co. v. Donnelley
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 31, 1942No. 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, engaged in the business of the manufacture, sale and servicing of furnaces and heating *545equipment, brings this action to restrain the defendant Connelley and the Connelley Heating and Air Conditioning Company, residents of St. Louis, Missouri, from engaging in the sale of furnaces and heating equipment and the servicing thereof in a restricted area in and adjac'ent to St. Louis, Missouri, in violation of a contract made by Connelley to abstain from so doing for a period of three years.
Defendant Connelley was associated with plaintiff in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. NewmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Estate of De Gheest v. Estate of De GheestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951