Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Estate of Shapiro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2011No. 08-17491Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTashima, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority’s disposition of the Us pendens and administrative expenses issues. I therefore concur in Parts II.D and II.E of the majority opinion. See Maj. Op. at 1060-61. I disagree, however, with the majority’s analysis and disposition of the primary issue in this appeal, the valuation of the Chenehark claim for federal estate tax purposes. I therefore respectfully dissent from Part II.B of the majority opinion.1 See Maj. Op. at 1057-60.

The majority reverses the district court because its holding “was premised upon a misconstruction of Nevada law regarding contracts between…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Harris v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. StapfSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Taft v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Western States Construction, Inc. v. MichoffNevada Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API