Legal Opinion

People v. Tonnelier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1911No. Docket No. 199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erorr to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Victor Tonnelier was convicted of keeping and using a slot machine.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Respondent stands convicted of keeping a

gaming room and keeping games of chance by use of a slot machine, and has removed his case to this court by writ of error.

After respondent’s plea of “not guilty” had been entered, the names of 12 jurors were drawn from a list returned September 5,1911, by the following persons acting as jury commissioners for Berrien county: William H. Seitz, Philip Hiler, Williain H. Watson, Albert Haid, and Benjamin Earl. Before the jury was sworn, a challenge to the array was interposed by respondent. This challenge having been overruled by the court, the jury was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fornia v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Niles v. SteereMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hewitt v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People v. LabadieMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Gott v. BrighamMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. GratzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. People v. McNuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API