Legal Opinion
Niles v. Steere
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Mandamus. Delator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order sustaining a challenge to the jury array interposed in a cause pending before him. .The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Act No. 142, Laws of 1883, was entitled—
“An act to provide for selecting petit jurors in the Upper Peninsula.”
The eleventh judicial circuit consisted of several counties of the Upper Peninsula, and the county of Maniton, which is comprised entirely of a number of islands in Lake Michigan. The first section of said act excepted the counties embraced in the eleventh circuit from the provisions of the act.
Act No. 93, Laws of 1885, was entitled— .
“An act to amend section 1 of Act No. 142 of the Session Laws of 1883, being an act entitled fAn act to provide for selecting petit jurors in the Upper…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Schlacker v. Ashland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Mays v. ShafferMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. McCreaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Hammond v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. EmersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Eberts v. Mt. Clemens Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. SuttonArizona Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.