Legal Opinion

Washington Mutual Savings Bank v. Hedreen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 61224-2PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolixver, J.

Richard and Elizabeth Hedreen challenge the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, affirming the trial court’s reformation of a lease, into which they entered with Hedreen Company, to accord with a loan commitment letter issued to them by Washington Mutual Savings Bank. See Washington Mut. Sav. Bank v. Hedreen, noted at 71 Wn. App. 1019 (1993). They also challenge the trial court’s ruling, affirmed but not discussed by the Court of Appeals, holding them personally liable to the bank for unpaid loan payments.

Jefferson Square is a mixed-use development in West Seattle,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Colonial Imports, Inc. v. Carlton Northwest, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Skagit State Bank v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Oates v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of Bellevue, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Crisman v. CrismanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Northwest Cascade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API