Legal Opinion

Cammack v. Chalmers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1984No. 83-224Published

1Opinion of the Court

680 S.W.2d 689 (1984)

284 Ark. 161

George D. CAMMACK et al., Appellants,

v.

Hugh B. CHALMERS et al., Appellees.

No. 83-224.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 3, 1984.

Daily, West, Core, Coffman & Canfield, Fort Smith, for appellants.

Friday, Eldredge & Clark, Little Rock, for appellees.

HOLLINGSWORTH, Justice.

In 1957, Kate G. Cammack, now deceased, conveyed forty acres of land within the City of Little Rock to the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas. A separate contract delivered simultaneously with the deed stipulated among other matters that the Trustees would develop the property into…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hubbell; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hubbell; Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Principality of Monaco v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Hagood v. SouthernSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Foote's Dixie Dandy, Inc. v. McHenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API