Legal Opinion

Calhoun, Denny & Ewing v. Quinlan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1915No. 12411PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered March 2, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, reinstating a judgment after an invalid execution sale, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Fullerton, J.-

On June 1, 1912, the respondent, Calhoun, Denny & Ewing, a corporation, in an action brought in the superior court of King county, recovered a judgment against the appellant, Edith J. Quinlan, for the sum of one thousand dollars, and the taxable costs of the action. Thereafter a general writ of execution was issued on the judgment and levied upon certain real property of the appellant situated in Benton county. This property was afterward sold under the execution, the sale netting the sum of four hundred and seventy-five dollars, which sum was credited upon the judgment in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmer & Sons v. SasseenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Hollon v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Scherr v. HimmelmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Bressler v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Smith v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griggs v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API