Legal Opinion

Ference v. Booth and Flinn Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1952No. Appeal, 33PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Drew,

Booth and Flinn Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, defendants, while constructing a road for the Commonwealth allegedly caused a subsidence of a higher road rendering it impassible and making it necessary for busses owned by plaintiffs to detour, with a resultant loss of patronage and increased expenses. To recover damages for the loss thus suffered plaintiffs brought this suit. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence a non-suit was entered. This appeal is from an order refusing to remove that non-suit.

On November' 30,' 1944, defendant entered into, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Lund v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Mellick v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Doyle v. South Pittsburgh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Robert Allen Brown and Lola v. Brown v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Valley Forge Gardens, Inc. v. James D. Morrissey, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Smith v. Rogers Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Southeast Construction Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API