Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pavan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 2016No. CV-15-988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJosephine Linker Hart, Associate Justice

| Nathaniel Smith, M.D., M.P.H., Director of the Arkansas Department of Health (Smith), appeals from the circuit court’s order granting declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to three couples, appellees Marisa N. Pavan and Terrah D. Pavan, Leigh D.W. Jacobs and Jana S. Jacobs, and Courtney M. Kassel and Kelly L. Scott. At issue is whether the disposition of this case is controlled by the doctrine of res judicata and whether two state statutes governing the issuance of birth certificates violate federal constitutional rights to equal ^protection and due process under Obergefell v. Hodges,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Tuan Anh Nguyen v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Federal Express Corp. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Temco Construction, LLC v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pavan v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. In re Gestational AgreementUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Ash v. First National Bank of Eastern ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Smith v. PavanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Turner v. SteinerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API