Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 19, 1983No. CR 83-60Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

It is my opinion that the trial court should have given petitioner a hearing on his allegations. No doubt the record does not reflect anything except full compliance with the rules of procedure and statutory requirements. Even if someone were to be holding a gun against petitioner’s head while he made his plea the record would not reflect such an event. Everyone who ever pled a client guilty knows the record can be inaccurate to the extent it never reveals a defendant wanted to do anything but plead guilty even if he had serious reservations. If this man received promises that his wife might…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API