Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1983No. CR 83-54PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

Appellant’s motion to vacate sentence under A.R.Cr.P., Rule 37, alleging a denial of his right to a speedy trial and ineffective assistance of counsel was denied without a hearing by the court. On appeal the appellant argues the court erred in failing to vacate the sentence or in the alternative that appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We agree that he was entitled to a hearing based upon the allegations of his motion.

The facts of the case establish that the Oak Forest Drug Store was robbed by an individual armed with a sawed off shotgun on December 16,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Broyles v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API