Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hatton, Jr. v. Joughin
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 5, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for a Rehearing.
2Per curiam
A petition for rehearing suggests that in our previous decision of this case there is an irreconcilable conflict between that opinion and what was said in State ex rel. Attorney General vs. Johnson, 30 Fla. 133, 11 Sou. Rep. 815, as well as what was said in ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR, 69 Fla. 68 Sou. Rep. 450.
No purpose was expressed in our opinion filed Dec. 12, 1931 (reported in 103 Fla. 877, 138 So. 392) to overrule or modify what was said in either of the two previous decisions cited, nor are we able to comprehend where there is any conflict such as the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hatton, Jr. v. JoughinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Paul v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
4Cited by5 opinions
- Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Kirk v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Hand v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1937