Legal Opinion

Paul v. Commercial Bank

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 3, 1915PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Writ of Error to Circuit Court for Marion County; W. S. Bullock, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.

For the second time R. H. Paul brings here for review a judgment recovered against him by the Commercial Bank of Ocala, a corporation. The opinion which we rendered upon the former writ of error will be found in 66 Fla. 83, 63 South. Rep. 265. As stated therein, the bank brought an action against “R. H. Paul, W. J. Hilman, S. A. Rawls, C. M. Sweat, and F. L. Sweat, as late partners, formerly doing business under the name and style of S. A. Rawls & Company” on a promissory note signed by S. A. Rawls & Co. Service of process was had on R. EL Paul alone. W. J. Elillman and S. A. Rawls appeared…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Teston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Rentz v. Live Oak BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Atlantic Peninsular Holding Co. v. OenbrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Sharp v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Corp. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Saunders v. LischkoffSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Williams v. SherrySupreme Court of Florida · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API