Legal Opinion

Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co. v. Nichols

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1968No. B-1002PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

Respondent, Benny Nichols, sued for and recovered $6,000 on a contract of insurance covering separate piles of cotton burrs which were destroyed by fire. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 428 S.W.2d 458. We reverse and remand.

The case was tried to a jury. In response to a special issue on damages, the jury answered that $6,000 would fairly and reasonably compensate Nichols for damage caused by the fires. The jury was instructed that, in answering the damage issue, “the measure of damage would be the difference between the reasonable cash market value of the property,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. Jefferson Ice Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v.. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vail v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Browning Oil Co., Inc. v. Luecke, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Griffin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Perez v. Los Fresnos State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vail, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API