Legal Opinion
United States v. Dave Witt, Abraham Inkeles and Murray Talanker
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 7, 1954No. 23073_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The indictment, under which appellants were tried, charged that O’Brien, Talanker, Witt, Inkeles and Rourke, former Internal Revenue Agents, named as defendants, and Zelnick and Miller, named as co-conspirators but not as defendants, conspired together, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 26 U.S.C. § 4047 (e)(4), from about December 23, 1946 until August 31, 1952, “to defraud the United States” and also “to defraud the United States in its governmental function of administering the revenue laws of the United States” free from corruption and its right to the honest and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Everett W. Thompson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. GrunewaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.