Legal Opinion
State v. Kromah
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 23, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2009-140328; No. 27212PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Miama Kromah (“Kromah”) was convicted of (1) infliction of great bodily injury upon a child, and (2) unlawful neglect of a *344child. Kromah appealed, arguing the trial court abused its discretion in permitting two of the State’s witnesses to testify about actions they took after hearsay conversations they had with the three-year-old victim (“Child”), who did not testify at trial. The Court of Appeals affirmed, finding the issue was not preserved for review. State v. Kromah, Op. No. 2009-UP-322 (S.C. Ct.App. filed June 15, 2009). This Court granted Kromah’s petition for a writ of certiorari. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Maconeghy Jr., K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State v. Stanley J. Maday, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.