Legal Opinion
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 10, 2002No. 2:01-cv-70908PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TARNOW, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION 1
This is an appeal by Plaintiff Michigan Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a Ameritech Michigan (“Ameritech”) from an October 24, 2000 Order (“October Order”) and a February 5, 2001 Order (“February Order”) of the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”) interpreting an interconnection agreement between Ameritech and Defendant Level 3 Communications (“Level 3”). Plaintiff Ameritech is suing both Level 3 and the individual commissioners of the MPSC, Laura Chappelle, David A. Svanda, and Robert B. Nelson (“Commissioners”) seeking reversal of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. HixDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. JenningsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. Mcimetro Access Transmission Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003