Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. Schireson

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 18, 1937No. 190-MPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity for infringement of patent No. 1,808,756, granted July 9, 1931, to George D. Beauchamp, for improvement in stringed musical instruments.

The defenses urged at the hearing and in the briefs are substantially: (1) Invalidity of the patent; (2) lack of invention and novelty; and (3) no infringement by defendants. There are other defenses pleaded, but they have been either abandoned or no substantial evidence has been produced in support of them.

The patent contains thirteen claims, but only claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12 are in issue in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Grier v. WiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Morton v. LlewellynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API