Legal Opinion
Broadphone LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 24, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00001Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § BROADPHONE LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00001-JRG-RSP § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., § and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS § AMERICA, INC., § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 41; Dkt. No. 45 (reply in support). Plaintiff Broadphone LLC has opposed the Motion through a response and supporting sur-reply brief. Dkt. Nos. 44, 46. For…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Personal Audio LLC v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017