Legal Opinion

Ferraro v. Fink

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1963No. 42,975PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This appeal arises out of an action for wages due under a contract of employment

Plaintiff (appellee) Douglas T. Ferraro commenced this action against A. A. Fink, doing business as Lattimore-Fink Laboratories, defendant (appellant), to recover wages due and owing for services as a pathologist in defendant’s laboratory.

Defendant answered, denying lie was indebted to plaintiff for the reason that plaintiff had, in violation of the contract of employment, performed services other than for the account and benefit of defendant, thus forfeiting any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. the Land & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. First National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Chisholm v. SniderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Ludwick v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Fieser v. StinnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Herr v. HeimanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Heatron, Inc. v. ShackelfordDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API