Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Mining & Milling Co. v. Spargo

United States Circuit Court

Decided April 16, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

At Law.'

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

In the first case the grantor of plaintiff entered and paid for the land described in the complaint at the rate of $1.25 per acre, at the proper land-office, and received his certificate of purchase on December 19,1874. In pursuance of his purchase a United States patent in the usual form issued to him on September 6,1876. In March, 1880, the grantors of defendants located, in the usual way, a gold-bearing quartz lode, under the surface on the land in question, which they and the defendants worked under ground by means of a tunnel extended into it from without the boundaries of the land.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ogg v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Silfvast v. AsplundMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cowell v. LammersUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
  4. Duggan v. DaveySupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
  5. McKinney v. BodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API