Legal Opinion

Johnson v. COLE AND NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 15, 1967No. [No. 63, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Queen Anne’s County, entered on the verdict of a jury, affirming the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission that the infant appellants were partially but not totally dependent for support upon their father at the time of the injury resulting in his death, within the meaning of Section 36(8) of Article 101 of the Annotated Code of Maryland (1964 Replacement Vol.). Appellants urge that the trial court was in error (a) in failing to grant their motion for a directed verdict on the issue of total dependency, (b) in refusing to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Larkin v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Havre De Grace Fireworks Co. v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Superior Builders, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Mario Anello & Sons, Inc. v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. StallingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Edgewood Nursing Home v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Martin v. Beverage Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Flores v. KingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API