Legal Opinion

Heavican v. Holbrook

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1972No. 38021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This action arose out of an automobile accident. The jury found that neither party should recover. The plaintiff appeals. There is no cross-appeal. The assignments of error relate to the instructions to the jury.

The accident happened at about 9:15 pan., on April 4, 1968, at the intersection of Dodge Street and Seventy-second Street in Omaha, Nebraska. Dodge Street runs east and west. Seventy-second Street runs north and south. The weather was clear and the streets were dry. The plaintiff was driving north intending to proceed on Seventy-second Street through the intersection. The defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lasnetske v. ParresSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Perrine v. HokserNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Laurinat v. GieryNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. CHICAGO LUMBER COMPANY OF KEARNEY v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laux v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Turbert v. Mather Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Rigatuso v. LoweNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Van Ostrand v. BeccardNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API