Legal Opinion

State v. Sierra

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2017No. CC 05C40355; CA A153534; SC S064237PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

This court reversed two of defendant’s nine convictions and remanded the case for resentencing on the remaining convictions. State v. Sierra, 349 Or 506, 254 P3d 149 (2010), modified and adh’d to on recons, 349 Or 604, 247 P3d 759 (2011). On remand, a different judge, who did not preside over defendant’s original trial, imposed a longer total sentence than had the original trial court. This case requires us to decide two issues: first, whether Oregon common law or the federal Double Jeopardy Clause precludes the second sentencing court from imposing new sentences on defendant’s convictions…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Thomas (A175763)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. W. Hills Dev. Co. v. DoughmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. BOWSER (TERRENCE) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. BOWSER (TERRENCE) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Bowser v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API