Legal Opinion

Armour v. E. Bement's Sons

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1903No. 1,157PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action of debt, brought by the plaintiff in error against “E. Bement’s Sons,” a corporation organized under the laws of Michigan, to recover the amount of four several judgments theretofore obtained by different parties against “E. Bement & Sons,” also a Michigan corporation, but organized at an earlier date than the other. The plaintiff claims to own these judgments by assignment from the parties in whose favor they were rendered, and he sues this defendant, “E. Bement’s Sons,” upon the theory that it is the same corporation, with a new name, as “E. Bement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Trust Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Spadra-Clarksville Coal Co. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Ozan Lumber Co. v. Davis Sewing Mach. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
  4. Sparrow v. E. Bement & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Fostoria Milling & Grain Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API