Legal Opinion

Dawson v. City of Casper

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1987No. 86-218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant David Dawson, acting pro se, asks this Court to address a variety of claims arising from his municipal court speeding conviction. This conviction was previously affirmed on appeal to the district court. We also affirm.

Appellant raises the following issues for our review:

“1) Jurisdiction over the Person of the Accused has been challenged by the Accused and never been proven to the Court by the Prosecution.
“2) The Municipal Court denied the Accused his Right to a jury trial in this Criminal Prosecution.
“3) The Municipal Court denied the Accused his Right to unfettered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brenner v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nollsch v. City of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Freeman v. Town of LuskWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zanetti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Miller Land & Mineral Co. v. State Highway CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. City of Casper v. CheathamWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Casper v. CheathamWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jung-Leonczynska v. SteupWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API