Legal Opinion

United States v. H & M, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1983No. Crim. Nos. 82-00040-01, 82-00040-02, 82-00040-04, 82-00040-05 and 82-00040-06PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

The four individual defendants and two corporations in this action were charged with a conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of interstate trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The trial of all defendants resulted in a jury verdict of guilty against all defendants. On September 3, 1982 defendant Jack D. Murphy died. On October 1, 1982 a joint motion of dismissal of the charges and an abatement of the proceedings as to Jack D. Murphy was filed. The motion was granted by order of this court on the same date.

Now pending…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. H & M, INC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API