Legal Opinion
United States v. H & M, INC.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 1983No. Crim. Nos. 82-00040-01, 82-00040-02, 82-00040-04, 82-00040-05 and 82-00040-06PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
562 F.Supp. 651 (1983)
UNITED STATES of America
v.
H & M, INC., RSE, Inc., William H. Quigley, Jr., D. Robert Rimmer, Walter E. Rimmer.
Crim. Nos. 82-00040-01, 82-00040-02, 82-00040-04, 82-00040-05 and 82-00040-06.
United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.
March 22, 1983.
Richard A. Small, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.
P. Daniel Altland, Harrisburg, Pa., for H & M, Inc. and William H. Quigley, Jr.
Charles W. Boohar, Pelino & Lentz, Philadelphia, Pa., for RSE, Inc., D. Robert Rimmer and Walter E. Rimmer.
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
The four individual…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Frank Runnels (86-1923) and Arnold Shapero (86-1922)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Maugeri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- United States v. Caputo, Fiore, A/K/A "Curly". Appeal of Fiore CaputoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. ClemonsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- United States v. Caputo, Fiore, A/K/A "Curly". Appeal of Fiore CaputoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.