State v. Garcia

Alvaro Jose Garcia appeals from a judgment of conviction, after pleading guilty, to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (cocaine), party to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)l, 161.41(lm)(cm), and 939.05, STATS.1 Garcia claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because: (1) the use of a dog to sniffhis automobile that was parked in the motel parking lot violated his rights under the Fourth Amendmént;2 and (2) the trial court erred in finding that Garcia consented to a search of his entire motel room. Because the dog sniff in this case does not…