Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Union-Leader Corporation

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 8, 1955No. 4396PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

In considering the motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict we proceed on the familiar principle of law that the prevailing party below is entitled to have the evidence considered by the appellate court in its most favorable aspect. Maloney v. Company, 98 N. H. 78; Isabelle v. Carnes, 99 N. H. 184, 185. On one view of the evidence the plaintiff was uncooperative, disobedient and inefficient, while on another view he was consistently successful, efficient and performed his contractual duties without complaint. The jury having adopted the latter view, which was warranted by the evidence, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marks v. . CowdinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Douglas v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Brandolini v. Grand Lodge of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Freeman v. FoggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1890
  5. Mair v. Southern Minnesota Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Ericson v. Playgirl, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Van Steenhouse v. Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Rubin v. Household Commercial Financial Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Kearsarge Computer, Inc. v. Acme Staple Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API