Stroh Brewery Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
The Stroh Brewery Company challenges the constitutionality of Senate Bill 933, enacted in 1996, claiming that amendments made dining the legislative process changed the bill’s original purpose and that the bill contained more than one subject. The trial court rejected Stroh’s claim. We affirm.
I
During the 1996 legislative session, three bills pertinent to the present controversy were introduced. Senate Bill 814 was introduced on January 18, 1996. Senate Bill 814 related to the marketing of certain alcoholic beverages and was entitled “an act to repeal section 311.070, RSMo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Missouri Health Care Ass'n v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Hammerschmidt v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Akin v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of Missouri v. FrappierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- C.C. Dillon Co. v. City of EurekaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- St. Louis County v. Prestige Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Corvera Abatement Technologies, Inc. v. Air Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Cooperative Home Care, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.