Legal Opinion

Lawcock v. United States Trotting Ass'n

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 25, 1965No. Gen. 49,697PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Defendant, Matthew Long, appeals from a declaratory judgment, entered after a nonjury trial, in which the court found and declared that “the plaintiff Gladys Lawcock is the sole and exclusive owner of the horse lone’s Boy.” Defendant contends that plaintiff failed to prove the authority of an alleged agent to sell the horse.

Plaintiff, Gladys Lawcock, defendant, Matthew Long, and defendant’s alleged agent, Jimmy Cruise, all own, train and race horses. In October, 1962, plaintiff met Cruise in California and asked him if he had a horse which she could race. Cruise told her about lone’s Boy, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Karetzkis v. Cosmopolitan National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Levinson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Schoenberger v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Sphere Drake Insurance Limited v. American General Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Wargel v. First National Bank of HarrisburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Crawford Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DvorakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API