Legal Opinion

Genrich v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1993No. 63252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

In this medical malpractice action, respondent contended in a motion for summary judgment that the statute of limitations had expired on appellant’s cause of action. The trial court sustained respondent’s motion and appellant appeals. We reverse and remand.

Respondent was born in Texas and he moved to St. Louis in August, 1979 to train as a resident at St. Louis University Hospital. On December 29, 1982, respondent performed a hysterectomy on the appellant at *210St. Louis City Hospital. In March, 1984, respondent moved from Missouri to the State of Louisiana. Appellant filed a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. King v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Poling v. MoitraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. State v. TustinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris-Laboy v. Blessing Hospital, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Pruitt v. Farmers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. George v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Cambiano v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API