Legal Opinion

Stonewall Phosphate Co. v. Peyton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion county. The facts in the case are stab <1 in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, J.:

A bill was filed in this case by appellees against appellant to enjoin the latter from mining phosphate rock on the N. W. ■£ of S. W. i of section 31, township 15 S., R. 19 E., alleged to be the property of appellees. Appellant owned the S. W. J of S. W. \ of the same section, township and range, and claimed that the mining was done on its own land, and not on the property of appellees. No question is presented as to the sufficiency of the bill or answer, and the only point to be settled is whether the testimony shows that the mining was done by appellant on its own land or on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Watrous v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. McClintock v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Liddon v. HodnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  5. Gale v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pembroke Pembroke v. Peninsular Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. South Florida Farms Co. v. GoodnoSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  3. Lopez v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Kirch v. PersingerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Conoley v. NaetzkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API