Rietman v. Stolte
Indiana Supreme Court
From the "Vanderburgh Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.
This is an action for damages resulting from an injury received by the appellee, Stolte, while at work for appellants loading timber upon a car. The complaint is in two paragraphs.
The first paragraph of the complaint alleges that the defendants, Henry Rietman and Charles Schults, are partners, doing business under the firm name of Rietman <fe Schults, and as such partners are running and operating a saw mill in Vanderburgh county, and are manufacturers of and dealers in lumber; that, on the 9th day of July, 1886, the plaintiff. was in the employ of the defendants, working in and about their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. StupakIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Vincennes Water Supply Co. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Ames v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Pennsylvania Co. v. EbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.