Legal Opinion

Owens v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1972No. 713DC709PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

In the record we find the following statement:

“The plaintiff does not now appeal any finding of fact of the judge concerning any other amounts owed so basically the issue is whether or not the Deed of Separation has been modified as provided in paragraph 6 of the judgment. . . .”

Therefore, we do not disturb that part of the judgment decreeing that the plaintiff recover of the defendant $90.26 and the costs of the action.

Plaintiff contends that the court erred in finding and concluding that plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement from the defendant for $1,321.78, paid in behalf of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Church v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Kiger v. KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Windfield Corp. v. McCallum Inspection Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Shaffner v. ShaffnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Shoaf v. ShoafCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Higgins v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API