Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2014No. S-13-891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. SMITH 797 Cite as

288 Neb. 797

VI. CONCLUSION We hold that the trial court properly denied Hill’s motions to suppress and motion in limine, and we find the evidence sufficient to support the jury’s verdict of first degree murder. We affirm the judgment below. Affirmed. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Brian D. Smith, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 8, 2014. No. S-13-891. 1. Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. An appellate court determines a jurisdictional question that does not involve a factual dispute as a matter of law. 2. Judgments: Appeal and Error. When…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. EwertNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. GonzalezNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. GoynesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. JerkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. BoeggemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API