Legal Opinion

Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

The damages sought to be recovered from defendant here arose through the loss by plaintiff of over $380,000 in its sale of certain alfalfa seed, which it had purchased at Vladivostok in Siberian Russia for resale here to its customers. The defendant had been requested by the Union Trust Company of Chicago to “ handle ” the transaction involving the issue of a letter of credit by the Union Trust Company in the seller’s favor, payable at Vladivostok, against shipping documents described therein for $545,000, afterwards increased to $600,000, and defendant had undertaken the business of “…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Ufitec, S. A. v. Trade Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Grouf v. State Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Dulien Steel Products, Inc. of Wash. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. Samuel Kronman & Co. v. Public National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API