Legal Opinion
Samuel Kronman & Co. v. Public National Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 17, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract alleged to have been made and entered into between plaintiff and defendants. The complaint alleges:
“ That at all the times hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiff herein was a duly organized domestic corporation.
“ Upon information and belief, that at all the times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, The Public National Bank of New York, was and still is a domestic corporation duly authorized to transact a general banking business, and in connection therewith to issue commercial letters of credit,” and that the defendant herein, Credit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Weeks v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Clark v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Laudisi v. American Exchange National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- La Chicotte v. Richmond Railway & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. Main & South Streets Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Bolivar v. MonnatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Linden v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Thoma v. KoeppenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
- Holzer v. GesellschaftNew York Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.