Legal Opinion
Cades v. H & R Block, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1994No. 93-2555PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*872Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge BUTZNER wrote the opinion, in which Judge HAMILTON and Judge GARBIS joined.
OPINION
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
Benjamin F. Cades appeals district court orders denying his motion to remand his complaint to state court and granting defendants H & R Block and Beneficial National Bank summary judgment. We affirm.
I
This action arose in connection with a financial service known as a refund anticipation loan (RAL), which enables a consumer to borrow funds on a short-term demand basis in the amount of the consumer’s expected federal income tax refund.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Independent Bankers Ass'n of America v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- 11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Incorporated, T/a Warwick Books v. Prince George's County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Landmark Corp. v. Apogee Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Moffitt v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING CO., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Moore v. Flagstar BankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.