Legal Opinion

Succession of Caro

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 20, 1932No. 30790PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

America Caro died testate, leaving no forced heirs. Two olographic wills bearing the same date were presented for probate. In one of the wills the testatrix disposed of a part of her estate and in the other she disposed of the remainder of her estate. The wills were probated, a dative testamentary executor was regularly appointed, qualified, and administered the estate. Pending the payment of the legacies bequeathed by the testatrix and the •disposal of the residue of the fund realized from the sale of the property, the collateral heirs of the deceased attacked the validity of the wills on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Succession of KronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Succession of WenlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of BoydSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Succession of GaudinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Succession of ColemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Succession of RaifordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. Jones v. ColemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API