Legal Opinion

People v. Phelps

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1996No. G016606PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

John E. Phelps appeals his conviction for hit and run causing injury, 1 contending the trial court erred by ordering restitution for future medical expenses. We affirm.

Phelps crashed the car he had stolen into a station wagon in which seven-year-old Trent McGee was riding, paralyzing Trent from the neck down. At sentencing on the hit-and-run conviction, the trial court ordered restitution pursuant to Government Code section 13967 2 in the amount of $150,000, $29,000 for past medical expenses and $121,000 for future medical expenses.

Phelps argues the plain language of section…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. KEICHLERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. MearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API