Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Schwartz
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1915No. 11851PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered November 20, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action for conversion, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Mount, J.
After the original opinion was filed in this case, a rehearing was granted and a reargument was had to the whole court sitting En Banc. The original opinion will be found in 82 Wash. 209, 144 Pac. 39. The facts therein stated are substantially correct. The record shows that the vendor of the boiler in question retook possession of the boiler in December, 1912, instead of February, 1913, as therein stated. Upon this question, the trial court found:
*203“That after the said default in payment and said election by the vendor to terminate said contract and prior to the filing of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heal v. Evans Creek Coal & Coke Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Watson v. First National Bank of ClarkstonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Malmo v. Washington Rendering & Fertilizing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Secor v. CloseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kennery v. Northwestern Junk Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Southern Motor Car Co. v. TalliaferroCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Bailly v. LoockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Dove v. Cowlitz Valley BankWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Yotter v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.