Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Aiken

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bell County Court; W. S. Shipp, Judge. Action by Jesse W. Pierce against Carl Aiken and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This suit was brought by appellant against appellees to recover on a quantum meruit for services rendered by him to them as independent executors of their father’s estate in the collection of a life insurance policy, to which action appellees plead the general issue. A jury trial resulting in a verdict in their behalf, appellant prosecutes this appeal, and seeks a reversal chiefly on charges given and refused.

It appears from the evidence that J. H. Aiken, deceased, had taken out a policy- of insurance on his life in the sum of $3,000, payable to his wife, but who died before he did, leaving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Taylor v. DeseveTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Sherman v. Connor & OliverTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Schrimpf v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Harrell v. ZimplemanTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. NorthrupOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Caswell v. J. S. McCall SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Pandem Oil Corporation v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Woods v. Ft. Smith & Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Caswell v. J. S. McCall SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API