XL Capital, Ltd. v. Kronenberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Petitioner-appellant XL Capital, Ltd. (“XL”), appeals from a judgment of the district court denying XL’s motions to stay arbitration before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) and to compel referral of the dispute to Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) for resolution. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, proceedings below, and specification of issues on appeal.
*385We review a district court’s determinations on the scope of an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Leadertex, Inc. v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Richard Oldroyd v. Elmira Savings Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ivax Corp. v. B. Braun of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kuklachev v. GelfmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Duafala v. Globecomm Systems Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- E.S. Originals Inc. v. Totes Isotoner Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Alstom v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Lynch v. HUB Intl. Group Northeast Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.