Ralston v. Kagarise
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
1 Cal.2d 724 (1934)
In the Matter of the Estate of W. H. H. RALSTON, Deceased. WILLIAM JAMES RALSTON, Appellant,
v.
L. R. KAGARISE, as Executor, etc., Respondent.
L. A. No. 14725.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
November 1, 1934.
Edwin J. Miller, Ralph W. Miller and Samuel H. Peck, Jr., for Appellant.
Libby & Sherwin for Respondent.
WASTE, C.J.
This is an appeal from a decree entered in a proceeding to determine heirship.
The decedent died testate in Los Angeles County, leaving as his next of kin and heirs at law two grandsons. The pertinent provisions of his will, of which the respondent is the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Danforth v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Wittfield v. ForsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ralston v. KagariseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Loomis Institute v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Pratt v. Trustees of the Sheppard & Enoch Pratt HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.