Legal Opinion
Ralston v. Kagarise
California Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1934No. L. A. 14725PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
This is an appeal from a decree entered in a proceeding to determine heirship.
The decedent died testate in Los Angeles County, leaving as his next of kin and heirs at law two grandsons. The pertinent provisions of his will, of which the respondent is the duly appointed and acting executor, read as follows:
“I give and bequeath in trust to L. R. Kagarise ...... my entire property at my death, both Real and Personal, wherever this property may be situated, and I hereby give and bequeath to the said L. R. Kagarise absolute authority to dispose of this my entire estate as he may see fit.......
“I…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wittfield v. ForsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Loomis Institute v. HealySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Pratt v. Trustees of the Sheppard & Enoch Pratt HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Maught v. GetzendannerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
3Cited by24 opinions
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Collins v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Baldwin v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.