Legal Opinion
County of Pasco v. Riehl
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-02705PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
620 So.2d 229 (1993)
COUNTY OF PASCO, Appellant,
v.
Chris and Wendy RIEHL, Appellees.
No. 92-02705.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 16, 1993.
Thomas A. Bustin, County Atty., New Port Richey, for appellant.
No Appearance for appellees.
HALL, Judge.
The appellant, the County of Pasco, challenges a trial court order permanently enjoining it from enforcing a dangerous dog classification pursuant to section 767.12, Florida Statutes (1991). The county contends the trial court erred in finding section 767.12 unconstitutional. We disagree with the county and affirm.
The trial court,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Interest of DBSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Hadley v. Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Barrow v. HollandSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Massey v. Charlotte CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Helmy v. SwigertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- County of Pasco v. RiehlSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. MilewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Bennett v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995